Let the lawyer games begin. My blog “Square One”, of October 1, was unfortunately prophetic. The WPI is in fact using money donated by patients to pay lawyers to sue Dr. Mikovits. One more in a very long line of horrible decisions. I am truly incredulous. This entire fiasco is doing great harm to the patient community, the extent of which is unknowable at this time. The research is destroyed. The notebooks and specimens are potentially compromised.
As I finished that last paragraph, a friend sent me Annette Whittemore’s blog just posted. I really don’t know how she keeps a straight face. She’s suing her chief scientist and the principle investigator on the institute’s grants, after termination without cause, to obtain notebooks and flash drives that Dr. Mikovits apparently does not have, since she was locked out of her lab suddenly and unexpectedly. I would say that as the “the guardian of this property”, Mrs. Whittemore has failed pretty miserably. And now she is using a little of the millions of unaccounted for dollars to sue Dr. Mikovits. I thought I understood the depth of the incompetence, but it just keeps getting worse. She thinks the patient community is going to be OK with this? Business as usual? Wait for the WPI to figure out a cure, without a chief scientist, and oh, please send more money? Who is she kidding? Sorry Annette, now we have to think about a legal defense fund for Judy!
I was going to write some good news, to follow the bad news, but I think I’ll write that when I’m not feeling like I’ve been slimed.
>The following letter was emailed from my computer at my house in my presence at noon on Friday, November 4. It was also hard copy faxed from my fax line at my office at the same time to the lawyer. I personally witnessed this transaction. I am beyond outraged at the shameful accusations thinly veiled by Annette Whittemore in her letter today. Patients need to know that letter titled "Our Responsibility" is full of lies.
I was also present at Dr. Mikovits home on Friday, November 30 at approximately 11:30 am moments after she returned from Reno, having driven all night. I personally saw the empty rental car driven by Dr. Mikovits from Reno to California that did not contain any of the materials alleged in the the letter from Annette Whittemore. The allegations in her letter are astonishing to me. Dr. Mikovits was fired by phone while she was standing on the sidewalk outside her Reno home. She never returned to the WPI. The firing took place at approximately 4:30pm and the lab was locked down by approximately 6:30 pm. Due to the activity of moving out of the Reno home, Dr. Mikovits had no opportunity to return to the WPI at any time. There are ample dated, time stamped receipts documenting and proving her whereabouts from the time of the firing to the time of her arrival in California. At no time did she ever return to the WPI facility. It is impossible for her to have stolen the items alleged in the "Our Responsibility" letter.
I am prepared to testify in court to the events I personally witnessed. Patients need to know that Dr. Mikovits remains fully committed to the well being of the patients. She has always conducted herself with the utmost of integrity. Patients need to ask themselves who had the motive to remove and destroy the notebooks. Who had a motive to remove incriminating evidence? Who stood to lose with the revelation of misappropriation of funds and materials? It was not Dr. Mikovits.
Lilly Meehan, Ventura, California permission to repost
>Lois W. Hart
November 4, 2011
Stafford Matthews
SNR DENTON US LLP
1530 Page Mill Road
Ste. 200
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
Re: Your letter to Judy Mikovits, Dated November 2, 2011
Dear Mr. Matthews,
My client, Judy Mikovits, and I have reviewed the demand letter your office delivered to her via email and FEDEX, November 3rd.
This is written in response to your statements made in this letter on behalf of your client. All of the allegations of theft, misappropriations, withholding of data and various intellectual property, and items, are incorrect, and untruthful.
Your client’s allegations that Dr Judy Mikovits has wrongfully taken and retained laboratory notebooks and other intellectual property owned by the Whittemore Peterson Institute, are not true.
Dr. Mikovits routinely locked the lab notebooks in a drawer in her desk, whenever she left the lab, as they contain confidential patient information. The keys to her desk were always in a placed in a convenient location easily accessible for her lab assistants. Dr. Mikovits habit was to leave them either in the lab, in one of the unlocked drawers under the lab benches that are underneath the lab windows. Otherwise, the keys were in the unlocked top drawer of her desk. Dr. Mikovits’ assistants always have access to their lab books and anything else they needed at any time.
Dr. Mikovits had worked for several days, including the prior weekend, outside of the country, presenting talks and representing WPI at meetings and conferences. She worked through the week until Thursday, September 29, 2011. Dr. Mikovits left her lab and the WPI building on September 29, at 3:30 p.m. after she had secured the notebooks in her desk. She informed her research associate she would be gone the next and the weekend, and placed keys to her office and the desk as was her habit, in the lab, so that appropriate lab members could access her materials at all times. While waiting for a research associate to pick her up so she could pick up her car rental to drive home in, Dr. Mikovits was outside of her residence on Sierra St in Reno, she received a call from Annette Whittemore. Mrs. Whittemore made an unreasonable and unethical demand that Dr. Mikovits give Dr. Lombardi a cell line paid for by her R01 NIH grant funding. Dr. Mikovits explained to Mrs. Whittemore that she could not allow that to happen, as she was constrained by her obligations, ethics, integrity and lawful obligations as a Principal Investigator. Mrs. Whittemore then screamed at Dr. Mikovits that (explicative deleted) she was fired.
>November 4, 2011
Page 2
Dr. Mikovits never returned to the lab or her office after being informed she was terminated. Dr. Mikovits was not and is not in possession of the lab notebooks or any WPI intellectual property. A number of individuals have keys to the office and lab, including the administrative staff, lab staff and custodial. Your client’s concern as to the location of those notebooks, and intellectual property, should be directed elsewhere.
Dr. Mikovits brought her thirty-year reputation of honesty, integrity, and laboratory research skills to WPI. This was to the direct benefit not only of the sufferers of ME/CFS, but WPI as an institute. Dr. Mikovits is the Principal Investigator (PI) on multiple government research grants, and those notebooks contain important non-proprietary information that was obtained in the course of said government-funded projects. The original data (gel photographs, charts, etc.) in the notebooks is important backup information for published papers and is needed for completion of publications funded by NIH, DOD and several corporate contactors. Data already published in scientific journals certainly does not constitute proprietary information. Dr. Mikovits’ notebooks, as well as those of the employees whom she supervised, should be returned to Dr. Mikovits so she can fulfill her responsibilities as PI on these government grants and corporate contacts, as there is an expectation on the part of the granting agencies that the results from government-funded research will be disseminated to the scientific community and to the public. Other than private medical information that is not to be disclosed to individuals who are not authorized by an approved IRB protocol, there is no “confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information” in the notebooks. Instead, there is important data that should be published to advance the field of neuroimmune disease. Failure of WPI to make these notebooks and raw data available to Dr. Mikovits so that she can fulfill her obligations and defend against false accusations of fraud will constitute serious harm to her reputation and scientific career. Dr. Mikovits has attracted a number of high quality scientific collaborators for the WPI and for the ME/CFS field. Her reputation for scientific excellence undoubtedly was an integral factor in the formation of these collaborations and in her being awarded a number of government grants as PI.
>Contrary to the statements you have made in the demand letter, Dr. Mikovits’ actions after being terminated have are not inappropriate and unethical. Unfortunately, those phrases could be used to describe the sudden wrongful termination of an individual whose direct efforts, and her well-deserved and hard-earned reputation for honesty and integrity, brought in over $3,000,000.00 for research at WPI. Moreover, Dr. Mikovits brought worldwide recognition and awareness of WPI and the victims of a devastating disease, ME/CFS, which continues to change the outlook and scientific research around the world. In particular, it is inappropriate and unethical for the WPI to prevent Dr. Mikovits from transferring to another institution the grants she obtained as PI, making it impossible for her complete the projects. This is especially so, in light of recent public statements that Mrs. Whittemore has made that WPI is no longer pursing such research at WPI.
>Fiction is fun. It will all come out in court.
>November 4, 2011
Page 3
fully supported her travel costs. Dr. Mikovits gave herself over fully to this mission, donating not only her time, but also in giving back portions of her own earnings to WPI.
Dr. Mikovits cannot sign the Termination Agreement because she is not in possession of her notebooks, flash drives, nor her laptop computer, which were taken when her office and lab was in control of the WPI.
Dr. Mikovits is not intimidated by threats of lawsuit; rather she respectfully requests that the WPI honor all of its contractual and intellectual obligations to her as she has faithfully honored hers.
Sincerely,
Lois W. Hart
>I am so disgusted. We have all been slimed. WPI can rot just like we have for 30 years.
>Sorry if that is a little choppy, the blog would not let me post the whole lawyer letter all at once. I think you can all see however that the claim of "no response" is blatantly false.
>Anyone wishing to donate to a legal defense fund for Dr. Mikovits may do so at the following link:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=ZXBTCE4KMY3US
>Thank you, Dr. Deckoff-Jones, and thank you, Lilly Meehan, for posting the truth. It is hard to think of the terrible actions being done by WPI, but people need to know what is really going on. I am grateful to both of you.
Patricia Carter
>This is horrible. I tend to believe Judy, though I can't really say for sure of course what happened. If Judy doesn't have a copy of these data then all that work will have to be redone! One has to ask why WPI didn't safeguard these data better, by say backing them up offsite or in "the cloud." What a disaster all around.
>I'd call it the kookoo fund. You all are going to be shocked when you find the truth. It's terrible to believe in something so much you forget who you are and why you are doing something.
>Thank you Lilly! It does prove that. Annette's writing shows just how desperate WPI has become that they will use patients donations and contest winnings to sue Dr. Mikovits with it.
>https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=qmbcWEhCuBmviyo26dwlonKcouDEPt5BWuVEf-7wNlqxo0oEA83_xDEwu0K&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8db2b24f7b84f1819343fd6c338b1d9d60
Jamie, is this Mikovits's defense fund?
>Can I play Devils advocate here? Why do you support a person who created so much confusion , anger, and furor between great scientists. I was a huge fan of Dr. Mikovits until she opened her mouth. She needed to keep it closed. Not talk about HIV/AIDS , retroviral experiments unproven, and she pissed off a lot of investors into this field. Why? Do you think she's doing it for the patients? Why did She lose her job at NCI? Why was she fired over and over? Those make me question her motive to find a retrovirus. She was a retroviral investigator. Wanted to make a big splash. I think WPI us trying to say the wool was pulled over theirr eyes too until the BWG. Now I think they are trying to move on. Why would they give the grants to someone who offers to take things outside and fight with Coffin, Natelson and anyone else she has an argument with. She ruined chances with doctors all the time. She is a liability. Is she not?
>Anon 12:50, here is the link to the defense fund:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=ZXBTCE4KMY3US
>The BWG didn't look at CFS.
The BWG used one method of XMRV detection, and the WPI had five methods.
The BWG accidently used the least reliable method (PCR) to detect XMRV and refused to allow culture/antibodies due to 'time and cost'.
The method the BWG forced the WPI to use did not use a stabilising chemical, rendering the results useless as the virus would degrade further.
The BWG results were meaningless as they had a cohort of 15 people only.
>I meant to say Friday, September 30 instead of Friday, November 30 in the first comment. Rage can cause one to make errors like that. Sorry.
>No Mikovits is not a liability. Try stiring somewhere else.
The evidence from Mikovits and Ruscetti will remain robust and relevant. They only studies that can change that are studies that replicate or use clinically validated assays.
ViPDx under Lombardi did the blood working group. And as Annette Whittemore said on Facebook "It is important to note that the results reported in the blood working were not based on the testing methods that are used in the clinical laboratory."
Controls in that study could not have been declared negative as PBMCs were not screened.
>I think that you're being very kind in calling what Annette Whittemore has done "incompetence." I would not say that.
I think she is motivated by financial interests and, unfortunately, greed. I am sure it costs a fortune to keep WPI up and running, with staff, high-tech equipment, mortgage or rent, and every other expense. This is a huge financial obligation.
It all has to be paid for somehow. And research was their ticket. And the XMRV viral supposition did not pan out at WPI in their lab. (Whether or not a retroviral or other viral cause will be found in the future I have no idea.)
Whittemore has to figure out how to keep WPI going. That her institution is also tied to a private lab that charged a lot for blood tests (a lot!), some of which may have been unethical — and the costs sounded unethical is suspicious.
When scientific research is tied to profit-making, rather than done in a lab with no strings attached, where it's academic and free of the financial basic, to me it's a big contradiction.
I have no idea what will happen. I hope that Dr. Mikovits has her day in court and can explain her side fairly.
It is unethical to me to spend patients' and their families' and friends' donations on suing Dr. Mikovits. The donations were to be used for research and I'd guess treatment. They were given with good intentions.
Whether or not XMRV or retroviruses turn out to be the cause or not, this is still unethical and profit-driven behavior on the part of WPI.
I think Annette Whittemore knows what she is doing.
I have always been suspicious of WPI since I read an article questioning Mr. Whittemore's financial wheeling and dealing.
I don't trust them or their motives, notwithstanding their daughter's illness, with which I sympathize.
And now Dr. Mikovits has to spend money on her legal defense and waste time on this, instead of doing research at another institution.
Hopefully, we'll find out the truth in court, and Dr. Mikovits can be vindicated.
>I think donors should demand their money back, since it's not being used for the purpose for which it was intended.
>Yes, demand your money back and then donate it to the legal defense fund. Blood test money, Count Me In donations, I Hope You Dance donations, Christmas donations, all of it.
>In Annette's letter she said the stuff was missing on or near the 29th. They have no idea when by that statement. Near could mean before or after the 29th. Seems they haven't a clue. Just who had access as Judy was locked out of the lab?
>You should do yourselves a favor and look at interfering with a business , interfering with a non profit, and defamation of character.
>The letter said WPI offices.
>This just further demonstrates what a farce the whole XMRV/MRV/HGRV(not a real term) link to ME/CFS was. Both the WPI and Mikovits were in so over their heads. The arrogance they displayed, largely lead by Mikovits, was astonishing. The idea that this tiny and clearly badly organized institute had super special detection techniques that the world's leading retrovirologists and the most advanced equipment could not match, was laughable.
I could understand a significant number of desperate patients sticking with it for a while, exactly because they were desperate, but my mind boggles that there are still some clinging on by their fingernails.
Let it go and move on. Mikovits and the WPI have only themselves to blame for putting all their eggs in one basket. Unfortunately there was a gaping hole in the bottom of that basket and all those eggs are now smashed to pieces….
P.S. How can you know that the WPI are using donated funds for the legal battle?
>What rights do those in the UK/USA study have?
My name and address and results are on that computer?
Im very affraid that my personal information has fallen into the wrongs hands.
Please call the police and find this computer for the sake of all those patients that have there personal information on this computer.
>I dont as a rule disagree with Jamie but I can see two clear winners here namely the Whittmores and the CAA with the probable addition of the lipkin /Coffin/ stoyle Mclure axis
patients will of course lose
the vip-dx reagents and cycling conditions are clearly not the same as those in the study led by Dr Mikovits and Dr ruscetti
once again it is worth reminding everyone that the ME retroviruses have nothing whatsoever to do with XMRV but are more accurately labelled as ZMRVs
The whittmores know full well that Judy does not have the property they are claiming that she has
Given that their actions are even more sinister than first imagined
>I agree with above i'm in the US Study and want that computer found, it has my name and results on it.
Contact the National Institute for health and tell them to call the police.
Best R.
>Hi everyone,
It's the patients who will suffer and thats a fact.
If the information of the study participants gets leaked out over the internet, We could end up with 400 names and results for the whole world to see?
This is very alarming.
I'm very pleased my names not on that computer.
>"Can I play Devils advocate here?" Anon 12:53
No, clearly you cannot.
Most of the information that comes out about Judy's interactions is heavily edited media content that has sought to paint her in a certain light for a long time.
Burning eyes, Joan of Arc references aside. I think the confusion you might wish to attribute to Judy has little to do with her.
I wonder how many times she has actually been quoted in context – which is why some may notice, these days she says as little as possible.
Astroturf is not going to remove support for Judy over night. There's an inherent risk in supporting anyone that your trust may be misplaced, it doesn't make one foolish to place trust in a person.
Especially a person who has so publicly put her career on the line.
"This just further demonstrates what a farce the whole XMRV/MRV/HGRV(not a real term) link to ME/CFS was."
That's just fallacious logic. It instantly reveals who you are. An astroturfer.
Hmm, I wonder if patients who support Dr Mikovits shouldn't feel even more committed following such an obvious attempt at politics over truth.
HGRV denial as a term basically reveals you as an ERV troll as well. It's the party line don't you know. It's interesting how obsessed with the ME community these people have become.
Time for the boy to shut up, there is no Wolf. Let the relevant authorities do their job.
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
-SJ
>Jaime, perhaps you can't share how you found this out, but I'd be interested to learn how you know that the WPI is using patient-donated money for legal purposes. -Jocelyn
>I do hope that Andrea Whittemore will come clean and admit that tenofovir is the treatment that improved her health.
Not all of us have millionaire parents who can buy us access to tenofovir. Dr. Mikovits' work would have helped us get it, eventually.
Why do rich people think they can ride roughshod over the rest of us?
Annette Whittemore has proven that she lacks the judgement and competence to run the WPI. She should go back to playing golf and lunching with the ladies of Reno.
>That's what Judy gets for directly attacking the billion dollar industry called vaccination. In today's world nobody should dare attack huge financial programs, whether it's Monsanto's evil work, vaccination, etc.
HIV was caused by polio vaccines. And objectively investigating other vaccine-related retroviruses in humans should be, like objectively investigating GMOs, a career suicide.
Annette and the WPI have now gone on the rogue side, for financial gains or because they could not withstand the heat.
I want my money back from WPI to give it to Judy, because when I signed a check I wanted to give that money to Judy's work. I will also ask WPI to not send me email or paper correspondence in the future.
>Anonymous above @7:37
Please leave Andrea W out of this, shame on you. I see no reason why she needs to 'come clean' as if to some crime.
And enough with the sexist smear towards Mrs Whittemore, this is descending into the gutter.
Helen
>Helen, I do not question Annette Whittemore's judgement and competence based on her gender; I question them based on her actions.
Her actions have demonstrated that she is incapable of guiding research upon which the the lives of millions depend.
If Andrea Whittemore's health worsens, perhaps her mother will begin to behave in an appropriate, rational way.
In the meantime, the patient community has the right to know that Andrea took tenofovir.
>Why doesn't anyone call WPI and ask them the questions? You would know if any patient donations will be used? Why did Dr. Mikovits report only certain results in the BWG? Why is Dr. Mikovits slides and misconduct the reason the Science paper is being retracted? Does WPI have proof of misconduct? Do others? Sorry but those are the questions you should be asking. You may want to do your homework first before believing one side over another?
>I'm really really tired of someone bringing up a person's rumoured private choices. The Whittemore's have put every single dime they own into WPI , finding answers, and ME research since 1988 when Andrea first got sick. First privately then very publicly. I've known them since Andrea was born. You know nothing about the Whittemore's or their charity.
>@Anonymous 9:53 am:
Do you think if we called the WPI and asked them these questions that the WPI would tell the truth?
Someone should get a warrant and search the Whittemore's multi million dollar home for the materials Annette claims are 'missing.'
>How would you know the Whittemore's have a mulmillionaire dollaire home? Lol What the he'll does that have to do with anything?
>The police are involved do you not think there will be a full investigation?
>Dr. Judy Mikovits notebooks are missing. On September 29th her slides are shown to Science by Abbi Smith whoever her partner in crime is. Oops now the notebooks are missing! Give me a break this isn't hard. If she had any decency at all shed give the notebooks back so the investigation could continue into fl what went wrong in the Science paper. If she's So sure she has done nothing wrong. PROVE IT!! Otherwise now the Science paper has to be retracted and shell never be looked at the same by her scientific peers. Correction she never did. She can have all the support of patients forever but as someone on the inside. You got duped. Big time. Poor patients. I feel horrible for you. Truly horrible.
>…this is all just one more disappointment. How many? That is really the question. How long does this patient community have to listen to this denegration of research and twisted agendas. I have been full blown since 1997 and 4 years late stage. Why should I and all others like me continue to be subjected to all this crap, and that is a kind word. All of us messed this up, everyone involved…everyone contributed. What a waste of the little resources we do have…what an unbelievable waste.
Jackie
former theatre producer/director/choreographer/actor/teacher
>@ Anon 10:07 am,
Since you know so much about the Whittemores' affairs, perhaps you can tell us how much money they are spending on legal action against Dr. Mikovits. Was this money donated to the WPI by very poor, very sick patients?
Harvey Whittemore is both filthy rich and a lawyer, which is a dangerous combination.
>"Please leave Andrea W out of this, shame on you. I see no reason why she needs to 'come clean' as if to some crime."
As people are suffering and dying from the same disease she has been treated for she should tell everyone what it is or she should no longer receive that treatment herself.
"Why did Dr. Mikovits report only certain results in the BWG? Why is Dr. Mikovits slides and misconduct the reason the Science paper is being retracted? Does WPI have proof of misconduct? Do others? Sorry but those are the questions you should be asking. You may want to do your homework first before believing one side over another?"
Certain results? Lombardi at ViPDx conducted the BWG. The slides issue is over as Science and the reviewer knew about the slide. They saw it during the review. The other claim about needing controls on the same gel is also stupid as the study was blinded. Catch up will you.
The fact is that Mikovits has done nothing wrong. And it is up to others to provide evidence if they want to make accusations. The same issue is there for HGRVs and the need for a replication study. Nope, everyone avoiding this. Why?
>We had a dream. Annette Whittemore has destroyed that dream.
Last year I donated money to the WPI, they probably didn't think that it was much but I tithed. Now I find out that my money is being used to pay lawyers to sue Dr. Mikovits. The rest of the CFS nation must share my grief and indignation.
We must not support the WPI in anyway, monetarily, by giving blood samples or by seeking treatment at the WPI until Annette Whittemore withdraws this dreadful suit. I had resigned from the WPI when Dr.Mikovits was fired. I understand that my name is still on the WPI site and I am asking that it be removed.
I have no idea what happened to the notebooks and other materials that Ms. Whittemore says is missing. My understanding is that Dr. Mikovits was locked out of her lab and when she was able to contact her laboratory associate, she was told that all was gone. I am glad that the police have been notified just in case the disappearance of the data is more nefarious than it appears on the surface.
I demand that the notebooks and all other materials be returned to Dr. Mikovits immediately so that she can complete the important work that she is doing for us. Frankly, the WPI has no use for the notebooks and other materials as Dr.Lombardi is a protein chemist and not trained in immunology or retrovirology.
I still have hope that Ms. Whittemore will reverse her legal actions and that Dr. Mikovits will get back her data and whatever else she needs. The WPI should pursue research that Dr. Lombardi is qualified for, such as proteomics. Then, perhaps we can support the WPI again but not till then.
Michael Snyderman, MD
>"but as someone on the inside. You got duped. Big time."
Who are you then? Come on be brave and tell us what you would never actually say? How were people duped? Without replication or clinically validated assays there is no scientific argument. The viruses are not XMRV/VP62, so we need to fully sequence them. All the negative papers looked for the wrong virus and didn't clinically validate.
>Well said Dr Snyderman!
>Many of my (formerly) monthly donation checks to the WPI were memo'd specifically for Adopt-A-Sequence. If no donation money made it to Dr. Mikovits lab, that is misappropriation of funds.
There are all kinds of rules and regulations regarding charities.
Seems to me it's time for the appropriate agencies (IRS, etc) to take a look at the books. Has one penny of Count Me In donation been used for patient care? Not that I can tell. Clinical trials? HA!
We've been had. Instead of a Nigerian Prince scheme, we've been taken in by a fat cat and country club queen under the guise of helping us all. Their daughter is doing better and the rest of us can continue to rot in hell. (but please keep those donations coming, folks!)
Annette Whittemore is in way over her head, and gender has nothing to do with it. If the Whittemore's sincerely cared about advancing the science and patient care, she would appoint herself an honorary title to continue to fund raise and hire someone *qualified* and experienced to run a scientific and patient care institute. Anyone with an iota of sense knows this to be true.
When Dr Peterson left, that waved a red flag for me. Who walks away from a spanking new building with their name on the side? No matter what his agenda, it spoke volumes about what must be going (or not going) on there. But I still wanted to believe the Whittemore's were in it for the greater good, and Dr Mikovits was going to be the one leading the charge.
Hollywood should come calling any day, this is so twisted and wrong. Maybe good will prevail and our heroine will be code named Deep Sequence instead of Deep Throat.
>Inside -Deep sequencing is continuing. Dr. Mikovits notebooks were in her office , not her lab. Dr. Mikovits lied in the BWG. Dr. Mikovits lied in the Science paper. Dr. Mikovits is lying now. Dr. Mikovits has not just duped the patients , she's duped *everyone* including the Whittemore Peterson Institute. It will all cone out in court. It would be do much better for her to come clean before she is in contempt of court.
all supporters